-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100438/#review1131
-----------------------------------------------------------


Okay, I looked at it good and hard. The patch is actually ok, and doesn't harm 
the gui update throttling (I had forgotten I had implemented that in a 
different way). However, the call to addPoint() should definitely be made 
option, for instance by adding a parameter to KoProgressUpdater's constructor 
that enables profiling, or an environment settings.

It's useless to store all these timepoints when it isn't needed at all, and 
takes a lot of time, as confirmed by Marijn.

- Boudewijn


On Jan. 24, 2011, 4:33 a.m., Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100438/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 24, 2011, 4:33 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Calligra.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Send progress updates more frequently. There is already a limitation on what 
> is send to the user in KoProgressUpdater that only sends updates only every 
> 0.1 second. Without the change it can happen that the progress is only 
> reported every 0.4 seconds. With this change the progress bar advances more 
> smooth and does not jump as without the change
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   libs/main/KoUpdater.cpp 8ea5fce 
>   libs/main/KoUpdaterPrivate_p.h af82419 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100438/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thorsten
> 
>

_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Reply via email to