On Wednesday 26 January 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 14:57:07 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Dag Andersen <dand...@get2net.dk> wrote: > > > > Atm I don't have any use for the tools docker nor actually any other > > > > docker except the Scripting docker in plan. > > > > This *may* change in the future of course, so it would be nice to have > > > > a way > > > > of controlling which plugins should be loaded. AFAICS it's possible to > > > > *disable* plugins if you know their id. I'd rather have the possibility > > > > to *enable* those I use and have everything else disabled. > > > > Anybody knows how this could most easily be achived? > > > > > > Have a look at KoToolRegistry there is a whitelist and a blacklist. I > > > think that should solve it. > > > > Well the problem is that by default, a plugin that is neither on the > > whitelist nor on the blacklist will be added to the whitelist. > > > > But yes plugins enabling is something that we should talk at the next > > sprint: > > > > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Begin_2011_meeting/Ideas#Plugins > > Would it be enough for a GSOC project to create a plugin manager that a user > can use? If not maybe we should put it on a list of stuff as Junjor Job.
A plugin manager like for instance kdevelop has is hardly a gsoc project -- it shouldn't be more than a week or so of work. -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
