To me it would make sense to have both of these functionalities combined in one program instead of splitting them into separate programs. "calligra /some/document.odt" could, for example, open the file in Words, and just "calligra" would then open the shell that lets you choose an application from the suite. There's no context in which a calligra-open with no argument could do something useful except showing the help, so combining both seems like the right thing here. As a matter of fact, this is exactly what the helper program 'soffice' does.
Am 22.12.2010 um 16:05 schrieb Cyrille Berger Skott: > Hi, > > For sake of clarity, since I haven't seen your commit (might just be lack of > time ;P), I don't have an objection to this :) However, is "calligra" the > most > appropriate choice, between "calligra" and "calligra-open" (or "csopen") ? > > I was thinking that just "calligra" could be a name we want to keep for a > potential replacement of koshell. Or for some other more suitable usage. > > -- > Cyrille Berger Skott > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
