It is out. -Steve
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that's it then! Thanks all > > On 6/13/12 10:15 AM, "Jesse" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >WP7 has been tagged 1.8.1 > > > >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael Brooks > ><[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Docs are tagged. As a note - we will now need upgrade guides for 1.8.0 > >>=> > >> 1.8.1 > >> > >> Michael > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Tim Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Tagged > >> > > >> > On 12 June 2012 15:03, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > TAGGED! > >> > > ok let's keep doing it this way then. it's a bit overkill but it's > >> easier > >> > > to keep track. > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Herm Wong > >><[email protected] > >> > > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > webos has been tagged 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> > > > > From: [email protected] > >> > > > > To: [email protected] > >> > > > > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:41:37 -0700 > >> > > > > Subject: Re: release 1.8.1 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Yep that was my initial suggestion > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On 6/12/12 2:32 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >So looks like we'll be tagging every platform to 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >What about future releases ? if an issue strikes a specific > >> platform > >> > > > (say > >> > > > > >iOS or Android) should we always tag all platforms to a new > >> version > >> > > > number > >> > > > > >? > >> > > > > >I think we should do it since we distribute everything as a > >>single > >> > > > > >package. > >> > > > > >I believe that tagging platforms separately only makes sense > >>if we > >> > > > decide > >> > > > > >to distribute them as separate packages. Thoughts ? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> iOS passes all tests and tagged 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Joe Bowser > >><[email protected] > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > Android Tagged. > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > All pre-1.9 work will happen on 1.8.1pre branch. > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected] > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> Js tagged! > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> On 6/12/12 10:53 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >OK, Waiting for the 1.8.1 tag on cordova-js then :P > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >+1 > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Filip Maj > >><[email protected]> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> I'll reiterate, my vote is to just tag 1.8.1. In the > >>other > >> > > > thread > >> > > > > >>we > >> > > > > >> >> >>did a > >> > > > > >> >> >> full circle on possible release types :) > >> > > > > >> >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> On 6/12/12 10:42 AM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >Not really sure where we are with this. Looks like > >>there > >> is > >> > > > > >>friction > >> > > > > >> >> >> >with updating *all* platforms to tag 1.8.1 (like the > >>way > >> we > >> > > did > >> > > > > >> >> >> >before). I'd say tag cordova-js 1.8.1 to the same tag > >>as > >> > > 1.8.0. > >> > > > > >>Then > >> > > > > >> >> >> >iOS updates and tags to 1.8.1. Source is fine - but > >> binary > >> > > > > >> >> >> >distribution, dunno. The reason cordova-js has to be > >> tagged > >> > > > > >>1.8.1 is > >> > > > > >> >> >> >because the cordova-js in a new project will be called > >> > > > > >> >> >> >cordova-1.8.1.js, and if it is not tagged, it will be > >> > > > confusing. > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >> So, where are we with this? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Brian LeRoux < > >> > [email protected]> > >> > > > > >>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> The benefit of version numbers to track bugs which > >>is > >> > > pretty > >> > > > > >> useful > >> > > > > >> >> >>I > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> think! =) I've just assumed we'd want to > >>synchronize > >> the > >> > > > > >> cordova-js > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> version number to the native code as a rule of > >>thumb > >> for > >> > > > > >>sanity. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> Is that assumption incorrect? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jesse > >> > > > > >><[email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > I agree with Anis, if I we are going through your > >> > > proposal > >> > > > > >> Brian, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>there > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> is > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > little to no benefit over updating everything. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > In my estimation, the iOS fix will not require an > >> > update > >> > > > to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova-js, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > which may be our line in the sand. If cordova-js > >> need > >> > to > >> > > > be > >> > > > > >> >> >>rebuilt > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > address an issue, then we will probably always > >>have > >> > the > >> > > > full > >> > > > > >> >> >>cascade > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>of > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > rebuilds+retags+hoopla. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Anis KADRI < > >> > > > > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> Is cordova-js updated in this particular case ? > >> > Because > >> > > > if > >> > > > > >>it > >> > > > > >> is, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platforms that use it can just be tagged 1.8.1 > >>and > >> we > >> > > > ship > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> phonegap-1.8.1.zip (just simpler). > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Brian LeRoux < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > Well, here's the proposal again. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 1. We ship a package and it is titled > >> > > > phonegap-1.8.x.zip > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 2. Inside that package we have files. Those > >>files > >> > are > >> > > > > >> >> >>explicitly > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > *-1.8.*.* (cordova-js would need a tag for > >>1.8.1 > >> > for > >> > > > > >> projects > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>that use > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > it..) > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > 3. We update the download with PATCH updates > >>as > >> > they > >> > > > come > >> > > > > >> on a > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platform by platform basis (as needed). > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > This could get messy given the shared > >>dependency > >> of > >> > > > > >> cordova-js. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Jesse > >> > > > > >> >> >><[email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > I only added the patch level on the > >>assumption > >> > that > >> > > > it > >> > > > > >> might > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>happen > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> again > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > before 1.9. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > But I can live without it. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Brian > >>LeRoux > >> > > > > >><[email protected] > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> I'd like to propose we take jesses > >>suggestion > >> > but > >> > > > with > >> > > > > >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>tweak > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> that > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> we do not add a new patch level. The > >> downstream > >> > > > > >> distribution > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>would > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> just read: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> phonegap-1.8.x.zip > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> wherein the ios distrib would be based on > >> 1.8.1 > >> > > and > >> > > > > >>all > >> > > > > >> >> >>others > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> based > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> on > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> 1.8.0 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> I feel this is maintainable and easiest on > >> > > > > >>implementors > >> > > > > >> for > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> platforms > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> that do not need to rock a patch tag. > >> Thoughts? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Joe Bowser > >> > > > > >> >> >><[email protected] > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > Android will not be merging 1.8.1 back > >>into > >> > > > master, > >> > > > > >> since > >> > > > > >> >> >>it > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> will be > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> based > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > on 1.8.0 pre-CordovaWebView. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Michael > >> > Brooks > >> > > < > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> [email protected]>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git > >> > > pointing > >> > > > > >>to > >> > > > > >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>same > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> This > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > way we COULD tag all platforms, but > >> non-ios > >> > > > > >> platforms' > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> just > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> points > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > to the same commit as 1.8.0. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> Yes, a tag is just a reference to a SHA. > >> > > However, > >> > > > > >>we > >> > > > > >> >> >>still > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>need > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> update > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> the VERSION file for each platform. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> All platforms but iOS should be able to > >> > branch > >> > > > off > >> > > > > >> 1.8.0, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>update > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> code, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> and merge it back: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - `git checkout -b 1.8.0 new-release` > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - update the version to 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - `git commit -am "Version 1.8.1" > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - `git tag 1.8.1` > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - `git checkout master` > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - `git merge new-release` > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - `git branch -d new-release` > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> - `git push origin` > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> Am I missing something? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Filip > >>Maj > >> > > > > >> >> >><[email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > Hmm.. Can we have multiple tags in git > >> > > pointing > >> > > > > >>to > >> > > > > >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>same > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> commit? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> This > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > way we COULD tag all platforms, but > >> non-ios > >> > > > > >> platforms' > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> just > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> points > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > to the same commit as 1.8.0. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > On 6/11/12 2:41 PM, "Jesse" < > >> > > > > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >I still think we should serve the new > >> > > > > >> updated+package > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > distribution, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> just > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >not modify platforms that do not have > >> > > changes. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >Call it a hotfix ... > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:38 PM, > >>Filip > >> Maj > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>><[email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> The thing is that the downstream > >> > > > distribution > >> > > > > >>of > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>cordova > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > (phonegap) > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> gets > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> *a lot* of exposure/downloads via a > >> > single > >> > > > > >> archive > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> containing > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > all > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >>platform > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> implementations. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> Tagging a 1.8.1 or 1.8.0.1 on a > >>single > >> > > > > >>platform > >> > > > > >> and > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> blogging > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > about > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> it > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> would probably work for the (small) > >> user > >> > > > base > >> > > > > >> that > >> > > > > >> >> >>is > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> involved > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > on > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> issue tracker+mailing list, and is > >> > > > comfortable > >> > > > > >> with > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>git, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> etc. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> However > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >>for > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> the vast majority of users these > >>are > >> all > >> > > > > >>"hoops" > >> > > > > >> >> >>they > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> go > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> through > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> and, in light of a latest point > >> release > >> > > > > >>crashing > >> > > > > >> for > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>them > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > already, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> probably would just add to their > >> > > > frustration. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> If we want to be up front and > >>honest > >> > about > >> > > > the > >> > > > > >> issue > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>and > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> how > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fix > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> it, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >>as > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> well as provide as simple a > >>solution > >> to > >> > > > people > >> > > > > >> who > >> > > > > >> >> >>may > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > fallen > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> into > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> the issue in the first place, I am > >>of > >> > the > >> > > > > >> opinion we > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>should > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> tag > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> across the board, blog about it > >>_AND_ > >> > host > >> > > > up > >> > > > > >> >> >>another > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>dist. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> Would love to hear what non-Adobe > >> folks > >> > > have > >> > > > > >>to > >> > > > > >> say > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>about > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> this. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> On 6/11/12 2:30 PM, "Jesse" > >> > > > > >> >> >><[email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >Before I tip my hand on a vote ... > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >Is there any chance of a middle > >> ground > >> > > > here? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >Updating all platforms to 1.8.1 > >>for > >> the > >> > > > > >>benefit > >> > > > > >> of > >> > > > > >> >> >>one > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> platform > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> seems > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >>like > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >a lot of overhead to address a > >>change > >> > in > >> > > > one. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >Could we adopt packaging a > >> 1.8.0.1.zip > >> > > > which > >> > > > > >> would > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>include > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> updated > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >>iOS > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >code, and iOS code tags, but no > >> changes > >> > > to > >> > > > > >>the > >> > > > > >> >> >>other > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > platforms? or > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >something similar? > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >Of course this would require > >>adding a > >> > > > little > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> documentation to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >>release, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >to say what was addressed, and > >>what > >> > > > platforms > >> > > > > >> were > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> changed, > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> but > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> still > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >considerably easier than the > >> > tag->domino > >> > > > > >>effect > >> > > > > >> we > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> now. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > IMO > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM, > >> Filip > >> > > Maj > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>><[email protected] > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> +1 release 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 6/11/12 2:15 PM, "Brian > >>LeRoux" > >> < > >> > > > > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >So we have a fairly big issue > >>in > >> iOS > >> > > 1.8 > >> > > > > >> >> >>wherein a > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> PhoneGap > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> app is > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >crashing if the user swipes > >>down > >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >>notification > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> centre > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > while > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >>in-app. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >The question is whether this > >>is a > >> > bug > >> > > > big > >> > > > > >> >> >>enough to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> cut an > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >official release for all > >>platforms > >> > or > >> > > if > >> > > > > >> >> >>pointing > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> users to > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> minor > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >tag is enough. > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >[+1] release 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >[ -1] do not release 1.8.1 > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >I think a tag should suffice > >>but > >> if > >> > > > > >> implementors > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>have > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> no > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> trouble > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >tagging a release then we > >>might as > >> > > well > >> > > > > >>save > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>>Shaz/Becky > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> the > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> >email/twitter complaint! > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >-- > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >@purplecabbage > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >risingj.com > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >-- > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >@purplecabbage > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >risingj.com > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > -- > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > @purplecabbage > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > risingj.com > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > -- > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > @purplecabbage > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > risingj.com > >> > > > > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > > > >> >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Timothy Kim > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >@purplecabbage > >risingj.com > >
