Hi Kevin,
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 12:07, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 7 Mar 2018, at 10:31, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >> Please don't put something different into LEDE than what we're working >> on upstreaming. It is difficult enough to keep track of the different >> versions as they are. The tc-adv repo is already rebased on the upstream >> iproute2-next, so if there is anything else that needs to be changed, it >> should be changed in that repo and not in a fork... >> >> -Toke > > Received & understood. Not sending to lede… probably a good idea anyway as > the main stats (not tin stats) are broken for me. I wonder if this is > because q_cake has to be imported to lede as a patch applied on top of > whatever iproute2 version they’re using as the base? > Will you update the sch_cake ad tc patches (from tc-adv) for lede? That would be most excellent, as currently the overhead accountin of the cake in lede/openwrt is, let's say, interesting ;) (and since I try to support people in the forums I would very much like to not having to explain this especially since Jonathan really seems ti have squashed that (but to fully confirm that, I really want to get feedback from diverse group of lede cake-eaters ;))) Best Regards Sebastian > > > Cheers, > > Kevin D-B > > 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
