Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Looking at tc-adv, I would recommend to use “rtt 50” (maybe it is “rtt 50ms”) which allows to directly explicitly request a new “interval” (which IIRC is corresponding to the time you allow for the TCP control loop to react to cake’s ecn-marking/dropping) “target’ will be calculated as 5% of the explicit interval, in accordance with the rationale in the codel RFC.
50 is certainly better than 10, but still seems to hurt single a bit even on a close server. On more distant servers maybe even more - I am getting results that are too variable to tell properly at the current time (of day). http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html?id=1488216166262542155 Almost OK, but with 100ms this test usually shows x1 and x6 the same. http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html?id=1488218291872647755 Of course as we all know ingress shaping is a different beast anyway and would deserve its own thread. _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
