The GitHub Actions job "Build documentation" on flink.git has failed. Run started by GitHub user zentol (triggered by zentol).
Head commit for run: 8dc212c32036c3a4afd3af2e50e95cb87c8cee23 / Arvid Heise <ahe...@users.noreply.github.com> [FLINK-36368] Do not prematurely merge CommittableManager (#25405) When a sink contains a shuffle between writer and committer, a committer may receive committables coming from multiple subtasks. So far, we immediately merged them on receiving. However, that makes it later impossible to trace whether we received all messages from an upstream task. It also made rescaling of the committer awkward: during normal processing all committables of a committer have the same subtaskId as the committer. On downscale, these subtaskIds suddenly don't match and need to be replaced, which we solved by merging the SubtaskCommittableManagers. This commit decouples the collection of committables from changing the subtaskId for emission. Committables retain the upstream subtask id in the CommittableCollection, which survives serialization and deserialization. Only upon emission, we substitute the subtask id with the one of the emitting committer. This is, in particular, useful for a global committer, where all subtasks are collected. As a side fix, the new serialization also contains the numberOfSubtasks such that different checkpoints may have different degree of parallelism. The old approach probably has edge cases where scaling a UC would result in stalled pipelines because certain metadata doesn't match. This would not affect pipelines which chain Writer/Committer (no channel state), Writer and Committer have same DOP (results in a Forward channel, which doesn't use UC for exactly these reasons), and a non-keyed shuffles (because they don't provide any guarantees). Since a keyed shuffle must use the subtask id of the committables, the new approach should be safe. However, since we disabled UC entirely for sinks to adhere to the contract of notifyCheckpointComplete, this shouldn't matter going forward. It's still important to consider these cases though for restoring from Flink 1 checkpoints. Report URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/actions/runs/11153413359 With regards, GitHub Actions via GitBox