Merge request https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863 
was reviewed by Joel Sherrill

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on 
bsps/include/dev/flash/flash_sim_flashdev.h: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863#note_136664

 > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
 > +

Missing Doxygen @file block

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on 
bsps/include/dev/flash/flash_sim_flashdev.h: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863#note_136665

 > +#endif
 > +
 > +/* @brief Configuration options for NAND simulation */

These are not Doxygen comments.

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on 
bsps/include/dev/flash/flash_sim_flashdev.h: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863#note_136666

 > +};
 > +
 > +/*

Again.

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on 
bsps/shared/dev/flash/flash_sim_flashdev.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863#note_136667

 > +#define NAND_SIM_FLASH_MAX_REGIONS ( (size_t) 32 )
 > +
 > +/*

Not Doxygen comment.

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on 
bsps/shared/dev/flash/flash_sim_flashdev.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863#note_136668

 > +
 > +static int flash_sim_get_flash_type(
 > +  rtems_flashdev *flash,

For all the methods, there is no error checking of parameters. Can they always 
be trusted? Should there be debug assertions?

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on 
bsps/shared/dev/flash/flash_sim_flashdev.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863#note_136669

 > +  if (attr->alloc != NULL) {
 > +    return attr->alloc(size);
 > +  } else {

Having this second half in an else is unnecessary and makes it look like the 
function can fall out the bottom.


-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/863
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to