Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems-examples/-/issues/2#note_135008 The only difference is the addition of `-lgcov` library. The options used are: ``` --coverage -fprofile-info-section=.rtemsroset.gcov_info.content -fprofile-update=atomic ``` and to quote GCC `--coverage` is a synonym for <samp>`-fprofile-arcs`</samp> <samp>`-ftest-coverage`</samp> (when compiling) and <samp>`-lgcov`</samp> (when linking). Why not be consistent with the flags being used? I am still considering what means. I did not know coverage like this was buried in the configuration options. How would a user know they have an instrumented RTEMS if we hide all the dependencies? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems-examples/-/issues/2#note_135008 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
