Chris Johns created an issue: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5255
Assignee: Joel Sherrill The following discussion from !488 should be addressed: - [ ] @opticron started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/488#note_122997): > So...this is technically correct as register g6 is reserved by the SPARC ABI for OS use and the header declaration allows direct access to g6 as if it were a variable, but this particular type of declaration is fragile since it uses a GCC extension which could go away in the future (especially given how the `register` keyword has been declining over time). > > A better long-term solution is to convert this declaration to a little snippet of inline assembler that stores into or retrieves from g6 as necessary. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5255 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
