Merge request 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-net-services/-/merge_requests/28 was 
reviewed by Gedare Bloom

--
  
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on bsd/freebsd/contrib/ntp/ntpd/ntp_io.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-net-services/-/merge_requests/28#note_122733

 > +#include <rtems/ntpd.h>
 > +#endif /* __rtems__ */
 > +

remove the unguarded whitespace change

--
  
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on bsd/freebsd/contrib/ntp/ntpd/ntp_io.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-net-services/-/merge_requests/28#note_122734

 >  
 > -#ifdef __rtems__
 >              wildif->fd = open_socket(&wildif->sin, 0, 0, wildif);

This is keeping the rtems side and discarding the freebsd side. This is 
incorrect. if the line with arguments `0, 0` is needed, it should be kept 
inside the __rtems__ guard.

--
  
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on bsd/freebsd/contrib/ntp/ntpd/ntp_io.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-net-services/-/merge_requests/28#note_122735

 > -#else
 >              wildif->fd = open_socket(&wildif->sin, 0, 1, wildif);
 > -#endif

as contrasted to this one, which is doing the correct thing because it keeps 
the freebsd side and discards the rtems side.

--
  
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on bsd/rtemsbsd/include/rtems/ntpd.h: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-net-services/-/merge_requests/28#note_122736

 > +
 > +/**
 > + * @brief Lock the NTPD lock?

remove the `?`?

--
  
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on bsd/rtemsbsd/include/rtems/ntpd.h: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-net-services/-/merge_requests/28#note_122737

 > +
 > +/**
 > + * @brief Unlock the NTPD lock?

ditto


-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-net-services/-/merge_requests/28
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
bugs@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to