Joel Sherrill commented on a discussion on cpukit/posix/src/psignalclearsignals.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/469#note_122301 > +) > +{ > + bool retval; > + Thread_queue_Context queue_context; > > if ( do_signals_acquire_release ) { > + _Thread_queue_Context_initialize( &queue_context ); > + _POSIX_signals_Acquire( &queue_context ); > + retval = _POSIX_signals_Clear_signals_helper( > + api, > + signo, > + info, > + is_global, > + check_blocked > + ); > _POSIX_signals_Release( &queue_context ); That's unfortunate. But I will remove the indentation. Resolving. We COULD require {} around the protected code which should make the indentation ok by a tool. But that would not be common and would be a lot of work to even find where we would have to add them. Just a thought. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/469#note_122301 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
