Frank Kuehndel commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/merge_requests/104#note_119767 My answer was confusing, sorry. My patch does not add a tty. When I tested my patch "manually" the problem was gone. When I used this patch in a CI build, the singlehtml pages were gone again - to my surprise. Investigating the issue let to the fact that in my manual testing the Podman container was connected to a tty while the CI did not use a tty. When adding a tty to the Podman container during the CI build, the patch worked again as it should. Hence, I concluded that beside of my patch, `inliner` somehow needs a tty even when I do not understand fully how the tty can affect `inliner`. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/merge_requests/104#note_119767 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
