Kinsey Moore started a new discussion on bsps/aarch64/xilinx-versal/include/dev/serial/versal-uart.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/47#note_109912 > */ > > typedef struct { > - rtems_termios_device_context base; > - volatile struct versal_uart *regs; > - volatile size_t tx_queued; > + pl011_base base; > +} versal_uart; If I recall correctly, the reason to wrap the pl011 registers with a unique Versal struct was because there were additional registers beyond the base register set on some implementations, but I don't see those here. Did they get accidentally left out? If not, this does not need to be wrapped. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/47#note_109912 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
