Theo de Raadt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rudolf Leitgeb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Lots of people (including myself) come from linux background and use
> > OpenBSD for specific security sensitive tasks. Since OpenBSD, like
> > every other desktop&server OS these days, has some strategy to deal
> > with OOM conditions, the term "OOM killer" is perfectly clear
> > regardless of what the actual implementation in OpenBSD is called.
>
> But it has strategy like that.
^^^^^ I mean: OpenBSD has no
>
> If you run it out of memory plus swap, it will deadlock. This situation
> must be prevented by establishing resource limits ahead of time, which
> we ship with pretty strict defaults.
>
> There is nothing dynamic. You are trying to compare a pig and a moon rocket.
>
