On Sun, Oct 11, 2026 at 10:15:19PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I thought that @U{....} was accepted in 'contain_plain_text' @-commands,
> but I checked the code and tested and found out that it is not the case
> (while answering Werner on @sortas). I think that it should be. I
> would also argue that @inlineifclear and @inlineifset could also be
> there. @w could also have been in @sortas, but this context is also
> for the accent command argument, in which there should not be @w.
Thinking a bit more about it, it would probably better if @inlineifclear
and @inlineifset were not there, in general they can be "outside" of the
@-command accepting plain text only, as @-command accepting plain text
only have small sized arguments.
So that would mainly be @U.
--
Pat
