On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:32:05AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 09:23:57AM +0100, Daniel Cerqueira wrote: > > The EPUB file is produced without any errors, and when I check to see if > > the file is valid (using the `epubcheck` program) I get this 2 errors: > > My current view on EPUB conformance is that seems to be important to > have full conformance in some cases (as Daniel reported) and even if I > think that having such a level of conformance is pointless or even > wrong, I also think that it is important to provide a possibility of > full epubcheck conformity, even if it is not the default. For the > release, however, I think that it is too late. > > Here is my proposal: > > 1) for the release, we do not make any change to the code, but we > document that the EPUB we produce is no conformant. We ship Daniel > patches in contrib/ and we document that they exist too.
Following up on this, I believe the issues fixed by the two patches have been fixed in the main code on the master branch (since 2024-09-21). As a result I have removed the patches from the contrib/ directory.
