On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:36:49PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 06:39:46PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > I think both should be documented as being valid. I don't mind which one
> > is presented as more normal. I have edited the node in the documentation
> > slightly.
> >
> > It would be ok to change the example to show "@itemize @bullet{}" instead
> > of "@itemize @bullet" as long as the possibility of omitting the braces
> > was still shown somewhere. This might potentially make the documentation
> > easier to read, as the discussion of braces could be given less prominence.
>
> Here is a proposal, with also removal of some text that imply that
> braces always need to be omitted (and, in my opinion should be
> removed idependentely of the other issue). Would that be ok to commit?
I've committed it in your name.
