> I think the output does not necessarily look ideal. You can see in > the attached screen clip, in chapter 2, the spacing is very wide > from 2.1 through to 2.9. I wonder if it would be sensible to try to > narrow this space, leading the spacing after 2.10 and following > would be narrower (say 0.5 em rather than 1 em). This would be a > tweak to make once the functionality is finished.
+1 Werner