On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:50:35AM +0100, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > I also saw that you were concerned about the OOP documentation > facilities, but this approach appears to be general enough to handle > those too. Am I missing something?
The reality seems to be that people don't use Texinfo to document C++ libraries very much and I don't really understand why but I doubt it is really suited for it. What we'd really need is an example of a manual where it was done well or some project that was willing to work with us in documenting a library in an OOP way using Texinfo so we could be aware of what the needs were.
