On 2022-10-13 06:48:49 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > This is the default if MathJax is not turned on or tex4ht or latex2html > are not used. The <em> tag marks the text as separate. There is not > much more that could be done - texi2any does not itself interpret > TeX math notation at all and is not going to format e.g. digits > differently. > > My advice is to use MathJax when generating the manual as described in > the same part of the manual.
The GMP manual has the following: @c @m{T,N} is $T$ in tex or @math{N} otherwise. Commas in N or T don't work, @c but @C{} can be used instead. @iftex @macro m {T,N} @tex$\T\$@end tex @end macro @end iftex @ifnottex @macro m {T,N} @math{\N\} @end macro @end ifnottex with for instance a use like that: Set @var{rop} to @m{@var{op1} \times 2^{op2}, @var{op1} times 2 raised to @var{op2}}. So, if a PDF is generated, then TeX is used and everything is OK, but if HTML is generated, then one gets something like @math{@var{op1} times 2 raised to @var{op2}} so MathJax would not make much sense on that. And since this is like normal text, I don't see why <em> makes sense. BTW, 16440098c6229e38fa6ecc32a07c0a099491815a:texinfo/doc/texinfo.txi (which was the initial revision, in 2002) says @noindent which looks like the input in Info and HTML: @example \sin 2\pi \equiv \cos 3\pi @end example so it appears that Info and HTML were treated in the same way. FYI, what was added in 2000 in GMP: [...] +@c @m{T,N} is $T$ in tex or @math{N} otherwise. This is an easy way to give +@c different forms for math in tex and info. Commas in N or T don't work, +@c but @C{} can be used instead. \, works in info but not in tex. +@iftex +@macro m {T,N} +@tex$\T\$@end tex +@end macro +@end iftex +@ifnottex +@macro m {T,N} +@math{\N\} +@end macro +@end ifnottex [...] @deftypefun void mpz_mul_2exp (mpz_t @var{rop}, mpz_t @var{op1}, unsigned long int @var{op2}) @cindex Bit shift left -@ifnottex -Set @var{rop} to @var{op1} times 2 raised to @var{op2}. This operation can -also be defined as a left shift, @var{op2} steps. -@end ifnottex -@tex -Set @var{rop} to $@var{op1} \times 2^{op2}$. This operation can also be -defined as a left shift, @var{op2} steps. -@end tex +Set @var{rop} to @m{@var{op1} \times 2^{op2}, @var{op1} times 2 raised to +@var{op2}}. This operation can also be defined as a left shift by @var{op2} +bits. @end deftypefun [...] In any case, if one goes back to the texinfo example \sin 2\pi \equiv \cos 3\pi a better treatment for HTML would be to replace \xxx by the Unicode character when it exists (there could be a table for that), and the other backslashes could be removed in the output. So one would get sin 2π ≡ cos 3π and I still see no reasons to use <em> on this. I would rather see a <span class="math"> so that there would be no special styles by default (like for Info), but CSS could optionally be added. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)