Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > Hi Jim, > >> Isn't this a regression? > > Judging by the three recent postings it definitely is. The change itself, > however, was made as an answer to requests from users who needed a way > to discern actual extraction errors from ones triggered by existing > files (and which are not errors at all). Since apparently both > functionalities are required, I'm inclined to introduce another > option which would act as --keep-old-files does presently and then > restore --keep-old-files to what it used to be in version 1.22. > > What do you think?
Hi Sergey, That sounds perfect. Thank you!
