I like the idea of having an optional warning for this, with the default being no warning, but is it wise to introduce a new level of verbosity for this? It'd be simpler if ordinary -v enabled this new warning, as it does the other warnings, and I'm wondering why the simpler route wasn't taken.
- [Bug-tar] tar with -k option no longer warns when not ov... Doug McLaren
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k option no longer warns wh... Sergey Poznyakoff
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k option no longer warn... Paul Eggert
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k option no longer ... Sergey Poznyakoff
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k option no lon... Paul Eggert
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k option n... Sergey Poznyakoff
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k option no lon... Jim Meyering
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k option n... Sergey Poznyakoff
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar with -k opti... Jim Meyering
