Paul Eggert <[email protected]> ha escrit:

> How about the following patch until we get this absolute filename
> business resolved?  It goes back to the algorithm used in tar-1.23.90,
> except that it falls back on relative names if getcwd fails,
> and it does not attempt to optimize ".." away.  For J Chapman Flack's
> example, this will cause tar to issue a warning but proceed and generate
> tar and list files.

OK, it sounds reasonable. Thanks for the patch.

> I have not pushed this.

Please, push.

Regards,
Sergey

Reply via email to