Sorry for previous mail. Was:
Thanks for the bug report.
Your fix seems OK. I check it asap.
Daniel
Le 25 août 2012 à 12:15, Daniel Diaz a écrit :
> Thanks for the bug report.
> You fix seems you. I check it asap.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> Le 24 août 2012 à 14:37, Thierry Martinez a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With GNU Prolog 1.4.1, portray_clause/2 ignores its second argument and
>> prints the its first argument (supposed to be a stream) as
>> portray_clause/1 would do.
>>
>> The culprit seems to be the line 57 of src/BipsPl/pretty.pl which calls
>> '$call_c'('Pl_Portray_Clause_2'(SorA, Term, AboveB)),
>> instead of
>> '$call_c'('Pl_Portray_Clause_3'(SorA, Term, AboveB)),
>>
>> This bug was not present in GNU Prolog 1.4.0.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Thierry.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bug-prolog mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-prolog
>
>
> --
> Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
> pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
> suspect n'a ete trouve.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-prolog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-prolog
--
Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a ete trouve.
_______________________________________________
Bug-prolog mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-prolog
