> I'm not sure what "documentation, not manual" refers to.  
Maybe you mean the man page?  Yes.  ~~~   $ man man                     General 
Commands Manual       man - format and display the on-line manual pages   ~~~  
According to this man pages are manuals.   > It's not expected that 
users look at the value of MAKEFLAGS that make   > itself sets (so, the 
version generated in a recipe).  That format,   > although documented, is 
technically internal to make   I was refering to C. Funk's proposition to 
define GNUMAKEFLAGS in .profile.   That's why I said about variable and 
about '~/.config/gmake.conf' preferred method.   I'm not going to 
use it, specially when it's in 'internal format'.   That was also 
my concern, if I can put it this way.   > The problem for features that 
impact backward compatibility is that the   > very people who are most 
impacted are the ones who would never try such   > a branch.   If you made 
it this way and announced in mailing list that this and that feature was put  
in the xyz branch to be tested and anyone interested or using this feature 
should check it out,  maybe they would try it.

Reply via email to