On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 8:12 AM Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:34 -0900, Britton Kerin wrote: > > What confuses me is that since the explicitly requested foo exists > > and isn't out of date with respect to any non-order-only prereqs (in > > the example it doesn't have any) and therefore isn't getting rebuilt, > > I wouldn't expect there to be any need to rebuild it's order-only > > prereqs either. > > That's certainly a reasonable way for it to work, but that's not how it > works.
Can we change how it works? i attached a patch here https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?66915. regards, Dmitry
