On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:32 +0100, Goran V. wrote: > Maybe I was wrong to call this a bug but would a feature like that > break anything?
If by "a feature like that" you mean a way to create multiple pattern rules with a single rule definition in the makefile, then obviously this would require some new syntax but assuming that syntax existed I don't see why it would break anything.
