Wouldn't it be safer to disable specific warnings for specific target(s), or specific sections of a makefile?
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 19:42, Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 14:37 -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote: > > Create a new make special variable "MAKE_SILENCEWARNINGS". > > I have toyed with an idea like this in my mind. When I think about it, > I wanted to create a warning infrastructure like the one GCC has, with > command line -W... options, allowing -Wno-... to disable them, and also > a -Werror / -Wno-error option to turn them into fatal errors instead of > warnings. > > I was just thinking to use MAKEFLAGS += -W... rather than creating a > new variable. However maybe there are reasons that's less desirable > (passing these options to recursive invocations?) > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-make mailing list > Bug-make@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make >
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
