On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 09:26 +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > I have a similar issue, but in my case I used explicit pattern rules, > vpath and added compiler generated .d files to make sure the object > files are regenerated on .h modification, but the end result was that > the pattern rules were no longer called after the initial generation. > > My tentative explanation is that the .d dependency rules are > considered more specific (but empty) than the pattern rules and/or > vpath is at fault, also. > > Is this explanation correct? Will the issue also appear in the > solution above?
I'm sorry but I don't understand your description. If you would like some help please post a minimal, complete example (and create a new mailing list thread for it). Cheers! _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
