On 03/14/2018 10:21 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
You might get lucky, but the maintainer probably has many other things to do - your chances will be considerably better if you write a patch that does it and offer that as implementation. So perhaps a better question to ask would be "Would you be receptive to a patch implementing an alternate version ..."Eddy.
You have right. But at least my implicit question got answered: no one is working on the posix_spawn() implementation. :) Unfortunatelly, now I'm rewriting the calc's [1] configure [2] mechanism, because it cannot handle cross-compilation.
After I'm done with it, I'll jump into the posix_spawn() thing. Áron [1] http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/ [2] svn://repo.hu/calc-scc/trunk _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
