Follow-up Comment #8, bug #51292 (project make): > I dared to propose a software extension which can be similar to the functionality “static pattern rules”. Under which circumstances can the generic variant move into the standard functions?
I don't see any need to move something like this "into the standard functions". If you want to be able to define a rule using a function syntax instead of a normal recipe syntax you can do this today with something like: basic_rule = $1 : $2 ; $3 $(eval $(call basic_rule,target,prereq1 prereq2,recipe)) _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51292> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make