> elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/20160205/commons> LANG=C make -d
> commands.cmo V=1
> …
> No implicit rule found for 'commands.cmo'.
> Finished prerequisites of target file 'commands.cmo'.
> Must remake target 'commands.cmo'.
> Successfully remade target file 'commands.cmo'.
> make: Nothing to be done for 'commands.cmo'.
>
>
> Now I wonder why I do not get the desired software generation results for
> this test case. Why is the source file “commands.ml” not compiled again
> in the way as the other one?
I have noticed a moment ago that an interface description file was missing
somehow for the OCaml source file in this compilation attempt.
I have added the following extra rules as a special handling.
commands.cmo: commands.ml
$(OCAMLC_CMD) -c $<
commands.cmx: commands.ml
$(OCAMLOPT_CMD) -c $<
I wonder then that the make tool did not give me a direct clue for a failed
software dependency as I am used to in other cases.
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
