Follow-up Comment #2, bug #48276 (project make):
So, I am not incredibly familiar with the codebase, but this is seemingly on a
code path where an error is already going to happen; ie, this is a more
specific form of error, rather than changing something that would have
previously been parsed successfully into a failure. I would certainly agree
that breaking such things wouldn't be good.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48276>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
