Is this the intended behaviour? % cat Makefile .PHONY: all foobar all: foobar foo%:; echo $@ % cat foobar cat: foobar: No such file or directory % make make: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
(Wherease when "foobar" is not listed as .PHONY, echo is run.) "make -d" reveals: Considering target file 'foobar'. File 'foobar' does not exist. Finished prerequisites of target file 'foobar'. Must remake target 'foobar'. Successfully remade target file 'foobar'. So make thinks foobar has an empty recipe, instead of using the pattern rule. I know that specific rules take precendence over pattern rules (e.g. if I had a rule "foobar:;", I wouldn't expect the echo to run), as the documentation says: "The rules you write take precedence over those that are built in." But here foobar has no specific rule, just appears as a pseudo-prerequisite of ".PHONY". Apparently this is enough to prevent make from using the pattern rule as well, but I couldn't find this mentioned in the documentation, so I wonder whether it's meant to be so or a bug? _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
