> From: Edward Welbourne <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 14:12:46 +0000 > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > > It remains that it is up to the author of the makefiles to canonicalise > names - or, rather, chose a canonical way to refer to each file. It is > not make's job to do that. Thus has it always been.
I agree that that's how Make always behaved, but you never explained why it has to be so. I think the reason is that, when the Makefile is read, we cannot necessarily assume that the current directory will stay current when the target is made (think recursive Make invocations with "make -C", for example). So Make simply is not at liberty to decide that ../foo/bar and /some/path/to/foo/bar are the same file. _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
