Follow-up Comment #8, bug #41246 (project make):
I understood that difference; that's why I said "The downside of this is that
ONESHELL actually behaves differently". However often this doesn't matter so
much, particularly on Windows where the rules about what operations impact the
parent's environment are not so strict as on POSIX systems (IIRC). I was
wondering if it was "close enough" to be acceptable.
In any event, I'd really prefer this be made to "just work" without special
compile options or pseudo targets needed. Is there a reason why that's not
feasible?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?41246>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
