Hi Paul. On 05/01/2013 02:04 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:39 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 16:04 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> On 04/30/2013 03:37 PM, Paul Smith wrote: >>>> Just to be clear, you're saying that the testsuite runs as one long >>>> operation, updating one target, and the recipe invokes one test script, >>>> right? >>>> >>> No; the testsuite runs as a recursive make invocation (yes, this is >>> sadly truly needed in order to support all the features offered by the >>> Automake parallel testsuite harness --- sorry), but each test script >>> (and there can be hundreds of them, as is the case for GNU coreutils >>> or GNU automake itself) is run as a separate target, explicit for >>> tests which have no extension and pattern-based for tests that have an >>> extension. >> >> This should work very well with -Otarget then, except for the >> colorization/highlighting issue... once it works as expected. I'll look >> into this issue later and I would be interested to see your experience >> with it once it's resolved. > > OK, I found this bug. Definitely make recursion was not being handled > properly with -Otarget and -Ojob in some situations; this broke as a > side effect of my cleanup to reuse the same temporary file for the > entire target, regardless of the output mode. > > This should be fixed now. Those who use recursive makefiles and were > seeing annoying delays in output with -O, please try again with the > latest commit and see if it works any better for you now. > I can confirm the problem has disappeared for me. Thanks! (The issue with extra "Entering/Leaving directory" messages is still present though; I hope it can be fixed before the release ...).
Best regards, Stefano _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
