On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Tim Murphy <tnmur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since you can't (in my recent experience) load a 64-bit DLL into a 32-bit > program, the real issue is what architecture was make itself built with. > It's sort of a matter of make identifying itself rather than telling you > that you're running on ubuntu 13.04 or solaris 10.
Which is exactly what make_host tells you. It provides the architecture make was built for in the form of e.g. "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" or whatever configure comes up with. On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:03 PM, David Boyce <david.s.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Well, David, when you suggested it I wasn't so sure. But now that I've >> thought of it myself... brilliant!! :-p :-) > > But now I'm having second thoughts ... That was, I hope it's clear, a feeble joke. I find Paul's insight to be a stroke of pure genius. -David _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
