> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:22:40 -0400
> From: David Boyce <[email protected]>
> Cc: Frank Heckenbach <[email protected]>, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>, 
> bug-make <[email protected]>
> 
> So I'd argue for:
> 
> -O line (new)
> -O job (current -O target)
> -O make

Agree about "line" (assuming I understood what it means), but disagree
about renaming "target": it is quite clear what it means.  By
contrast, "make" is not so clear; perhaps we should rename it
"makefile" or something.

_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Reply via email to