Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:39:44 +0200 > > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > > From: Frank Heckenbach <[email protected]> > > > > Indeed, as you suggested earlier, it might be useful to use the main > > part of open_tmpfile() (i.e. without the fdopen()), though we'd have > > to manually remove the file then. On Unix, we could unlink it right > > after opening (since we never need the filename again, unlike the > > other users of open_tmpfile()). On Windows, though, this might need > > to be delayed, AIUI. > > You can do that on Windows as well, just not if you use open/creat to > create the file. You need to use the Windows file APIs with options > that are not exposed to Posix-style functions like open.
Can you get an fd from a file opened this way? If so, it should be alright, it could all be encapsulated in open_tmpfd(). _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
