It would be nicest to actually use git (or if we were in heaven, Mercurial)!
:-)

Cheers,

Tim

On 3 January 2013 20:20, Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de> wrote:
>> > BTW, I wanted to check against the current repository version, but
>> > when I tried to fetch it as described on
>> > https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=make, I got:
>> >
>> > % git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/make.git
>> > Cloning into make...
>> > warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository.
>>
>> Use CVS, not git, to fetch the latest development sources of Make.
>
> With the CVS version, I cannot reproduce the bug, neither with the
> test case nor with my actual code, so I suppose it's fixed by now.
>
> I now see where the confusion WRT git/cvs comes from. In the top
> menu on the Savannah page under "Quelltext" (I alway get the German
> version and see no way to change it, it's probably called "Source
> code" in English), there is "Use Git" at #1 and "Use CVS" at #3.
> If, apparently, no Git repository exists, it would be useful to
> remove the Git entry or at least put it below the CVS one or mark it
> as "under construction" or whatever to avoid confusing users.
>
> Frank
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-make mailing list
> Bug-make@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make



-- 
You could help some brave and decent people to have access to
uncensored news by making a donation at:

http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/friends/

_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Reply via email to