Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> writes:
> One example: I think saving stdout and stderr to different files and
> then printing them separately is problematic; consider if your recipe
> prints lots of information lines, with errors (to stdout) interspersed.
> If you throw all the errors to the end you lose a lot of context.
FWIW, A commercial distributed make system I use at work has a
"--xxxxx-mergestreams" command line option to control whether stdout &
stderr are merged or not. By default, the streams are merged. I tend
to agree that this is the more useful behavior.
--jtc
--
J.T. Conklin
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
