tags 314306 + upstream quit Hi Paul et al,
Simon Richter wrote[1]: > after spending quite some tme debugging less-than strict dependencies > with -j2, I thought it would be a nice addition if make were able to > attempt to invert the order of rule execution while still respecting the > order imposed by the dependencies. While this would not catch all error > cases, it would be a great tool in debugging. Likewise it might be nice to be able to pass in a seed and get deterministically pseudo-random ordering. What do you think? Does this sound reasonable? Any hints for someone wanting to try it out? Thanks for an interesting report and thanks for gmake. Jonathan [1] http://bugs.debian.org/314306 _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
