Follow-up Comment #12, bug #30381 (project make):
Another idea is to make the "Avoiding implicit rule recursion" message report
which rule is being avoided.
For this it seems necessary to either add a floc field to struct rule or give
even commandless rules a cmds field so as to allow the use of
rule->cmds->floc.
Would this be acceptable?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30381>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
