Follow-up Comment #7, bug #30370 (project make):
Thanks for the comments.
Yes, supporting multiple masks directly in the dependency matching, based on
regular expressions, is fundamentally different from using dynamically set
variables as "pseudo-masks" which is what the foreach-call-eval-solution
amounts to; if this is adopted, a special syntax to improve readability of the
latter type of solution won't be necessary. (Olexiy, my makefiles look a
little like yours. Surely you don't consider your example fragment as easy to
read or write as a solution with multiple masks would be?)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30370>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
