On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Here's the issue: if you write a rule like this: > > foo %.c: ; @: oops > > it actually works! This, I believe, should be illegal.
Just to be clear, the problem with mixing a pattern with a normal target is what happens when there's a pattern prerequisite, right? I mean, the example you gave at least has a sensical _possible_ interpretation, but this: foo %.c: %.c.real ; @: cp $< $@ doesn't, so make _has_ to detect and throw an error there. Philip Guenther _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
