On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Ilya N. Golubev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Occurs in any `Makefile' obtained from > Makefile.in generated by automake 1.10.1 from Makefile.am. > so reproducing should be easy.
You'd rather make people download and install something they may not need instead of copy-n-pasting the Makefile into to your email. Nice way to be helpful there when asking for help! Note that you haven't actually provided enough information to reproduce the situation even if I did have a copy of automake 1.10.1 on hand: what specific package was this with? What arguments were passed to 'configure'? What directory layout? What arguments passed to make? Are we supposed to just *guess*??! > All `Makefile' modification was removing `Makefile' target. Umm, what? If you remove the 'Makefile' target, then why would make care that the Makefile.in file is out of date? Are you including it as a target on the command line? For that matter, how are you invoking make in your tests? Please describe the behavior when you do *not* edit the Makefile to remove the 'Makefile' target. > The reason was obvious: otherwise `make' would fail due to `Makefile' not > remade. Could you please show the actual command output and error messages and makefile contents? Philip Guenther _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
