Paul,

Didn't you get that backwards?

Shouldn't it be that bar and its prerequistes are built after foo and
all its prerequisites?

Reid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul D. Smith
> 
> I think the goal of this:
> 
>     all: foo .WAIT bar
> 
>     foo: baz biz
>     bar: boz booz
> 
> would be that neither foo NOR any of its prerequisites would 
> be built until bar and all if its prerequisites were finished.


_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Reply via email to