Is it just me or is "make check" completely hosed? I'm not at all confident in my environment here so this isn't rhetorical. Can someone please confirm a working "make check" please?
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all; > > I've published the second Release Candidate for GNU make 3.80. You can > get it from: > > ftp://alpha.ftp.org/gnu/make/ > > Contrary to what the name might imply, there have been a number of > changes between the first and second Release Candidates. Please try > this one out (especially on the different platforms) and let me know of > any issues you encounter. > > Thanks, and have fun! > > > The md5sums are: > > 556f54b6fae38419f701efa647e2ead2 make-3.80rc2.tar.gz > 21139c324a76faffb6f439313e942750 make-3.80rc2.tar.bz2 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> > > iD8DBQE9fpfe5fJS1Uv3KFcRArFIAJ9klIFkBAGVNSNBWeunq8OOX5NQgQCfYhQI > FZk7QCFsQDBxORgGNQRgahc= > =vDs4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
